The recent shift towards a new standard of proof in workers’ compensation retaliation cases marks a profound change in the legal landscape. This shift places a greater onus onto employers to substantiate their non-retaliatory reasons for adverse actions, and challenges employees to demonstrate that their claim was a pivotal factor in the employer’s decision. This…
In a case that could potentially reshape employer-employee relations, Riggan Law Firm has recently initiated a wrongful termination lawsuit against The Hayman Company. The suit alleges that the company breached anti-discrimination laws on age, race, and gender grounds. Furthermore, it is claimed that the plaintiff was a victim of retaliatory measures after voicing concerns about…
The recent lawsuit filed by the Riggan Law Firm against multiple St. Louis eateries has not only put the spotlight on the rampant tip misappropriation in the restaurant industry, but also raises serious questions about the fairness and transparency of wage practices. The implications of this lawsuit might have far-reaching effects on labor laws and could…
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) settlements, which often involve intricate negotiations and agreements, raise a pertinent question: Is the approval of the Department of Labor (DOL) or court necessary? While both entities play substantial roles in the enforcement and compliance of labor standards, discerning their specific involvement in FLSA settlements provides a clearer understanding…
The recent filing of a class/collective action wage lawsuit by Riggan Law Firm against Colton’s Steak House & Grill has stirred up significant conversations around wage violations in the restaurant industry. The lawsuit alleges Colton’s failed to pay minimum wage, did not compensate for overtime, and engaged in improper tip pooling. Though the financial implications…
As Missouri gears up for a 10 cent increase in its minimum wage, effective January 1, 2013, it raises a multitude of questions about the economic implications of this move. Does it signify an encouraging step towards improving the standard of living for low-income workers, or could it pose a detriment to small businesses and…
In the domain of workplace ethics, negligent supervision, particularly in the context of sexual harassment cases, has emerged as a pervasive issue. This particular form of negligence, which can result in a hostile work environment, is often a consequence of insufficient training, unclear policies, and inadequate responses to complaints. The ramifications of such negligence are…
The recent ruling of the Missouri Supreme Court concerning “Sign-or-Be-Fired” agreements has undeniably altered the landscape of employment laws and its interpretation. This ruling is pivotal as it underscores the significance of free will and consent in employment contracts, thereby providing employees with a more secure and equitable work environment. Additionally, it imposes a moral…
The Holloran, White, Schwarts, & Gaertner, LLP case, a landmark in the domain of legal ethics, provides a fascinating exploration of professional conduct within the legal profession. This case, revolving around allegations of breached fiduciary duties and contractual obligations, sparks a conversation on the importance of adherence to ethical standards. The implications of the case’s…
In a recent legal development, a Burger King cashier has accused the renowned fast-food chain of wage theft and retaliation, invoking her rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). This case, which underscores the pervasive issue of wage exploitation and poor treatment of low-wage workers in the fast-food industry, could potentially set a significant…